Types of Security Attacks in Blockchain
Blockchain networks rely on consensus mechanisms to maintain security, but they are still vulnerable to various types of attacks that can compromise their integrity. In this lesson, we're going to explain types of security attacks on blockchain.
51% Attack
51% attack refers to a situation where a single network participant or group of participants controls more than 50% of the network’s computing power. This allows the participants, also called miners, to double-spend the cryptocurrency. Normally, the involved miners rent hash power from a third party. Double spending occurs when a digital currency such as cryptocurrency is spent twice. As you can assume, this results in a loss to blockchain.
Case : Bitcoin Gold
A popular case of the 51% attack is that of Bitcoin Gold which occurred on 18 May 2018. In this case, the attacker controlled more than 50% of the hash power of the blockchain. As a result, these malicious actors managed to double-spend the coins for several days. In all, they stole $18 million worth of Bitcoin Gold. \
Ethereum Classic is another example of a crypto project that suffered 51% attacks three times in 2020. As the examples show, 51% attacks are the most significant disadvantage of the proof-of-work consensus mechanism.
Read more : What is a 51% Attack ?
Double Spending
Double-spending means using the same fund for two or more transactions. The advent of online payment ensures that authorities put measures in place to prevent this problem from occurring. \
The existence of intermediaries in the traditional payment systems between the sender and receiver, such as banks and credit card companies, makes it easy to validate transactions. These third parties are trusted to ensure the sender has enough balance to carry out a transaction, and he/she is not sending two or more transactions that only count as one against his balance.
The absence of an intermediary in cryptocurrency requires that a measure is put in place to prevent such risk that can compromise the system. Bitcoin is the first successful digital currency to come up with this measure through its proof-of-work mechanism.
Read more : What Is Double Spending ?
Sybil Attack
A Sybil Attack is when one computer system creates and uses many fake identities to harm a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to get more power and do illegal things against the network rules. The fake identities pretend to be real users but they are controlled by one entity or person. The idea of this attack comes from a book called 《 Sybil 》, where a woman named Sybil Dorsett had multiple personalities. Brian Zill named this attack and John R. Douceur wrote a paper about it comparing it to Dorsett’s disorder.
A Sybil attack on blockchain is when someone manipulates or controls a P2P network by creating and using multiple accounts or nodes. A successful Sybil attack can block users from the network by rejecting blocks or doing a 51% attack ( controlling most of the network ). A Sybil attack is a serious threat to blockchain as it can damage the network’s reputation and cause problems like double-spending.
Read more : What Is a Sybil Attack ?
Dusting Attack
A dusting attack is a way for third parties to identify the person behind a crypto wallet by sending small amounts of cryptocurrency to multiple wallets. This compromises the wallet’s security and privacy. If the user does not notice and convert the tiny deposit, it may lead to phishing or identity disclosure.
The deposit may come as an airdrop that tempts the user to cash out, giving the attacker access to the wallet through the contract address. Many crypto traders or investors ignore the small coins left or transferred in their wallets, which allows dusting attacks to happen.
Read more : What Is a Dusting Attack ?
Replay Attack
A replay attack is when a hacker intercepts and reuses valid data to bypass encryption in a blockchain. This creates a vulnerability in the network. This attack can harm blockchains by accessing information, withdrawing money, duplicating transactions and stealing data with valid credentials. \
However, the damage of replay attacks is limited. The hacker cannot change the data or compromise the chain. The network will reject invalid entries. Replay attacks can be prevented by adding timestamps to data or limiting transactions with the same code.
Read more : What Is a Replay Attack?
Throughout this course, we have learned about the different types of security attacks that can occur in blockchain. We have seen examples of 51% attacks, double spending, Sybil attacks, dusting attacks, and replay attacks, which all pose risks to the security of blockchain systems.
Although these security attacks barely happen, it is crucial to recognize that they pose potential risks when accessing new blockchain networks. As the blockchain industry continues to advance and expand, it is necessary to stay informed about these vulnerabilities to maintain secure and trustworthy transactions.
To mitigate these risks, it is recommended to use reputable and established blockchain networks, avoid sharing private keys or passwords, and stay up-to-date on the latest security protocols and best practices.
By taking these precautions, we can minimize the likelihood of security breaches and ensure the continued success of blockchain technology.
Plain Text
Do not upload this part below !!!
---
Please attach some related articles. - link
Ref :
What Is Cryptography?
What Is Public Key Cryptography (PKC) ?
What Makes a Blockchain Secure ?
What Is a Replay Attack ?
What is End-to-End Encryption (E2EE) ?
General Security Principles in Blockchain
What Are Hardware and Software Wallets?
How to Protect Yourself From Seed Phrase Scams
What Is The Byzantine Generals Problem
What is a Vampire Attack?
Types of Security Attacks in Blockchain
Blockchain networks rely on consensus mechanisms to maintain security, but they are still vulnerable to various types of attacks that can compromise their integrity. In this lesson, we're going to explain types of security attacks on blockchain.
51% Attack
51% attack refers to a situation where a single network participant or group of participants controls more than 50% of the network’s computing power. This allows the participants, also called miners, to double-spend the cryptocurrency. Normally, the involved miners rent hash power from a third party. Double spending occurs when a digital currency such as cryptocurrency is spent twice. As you can assume, this results in a loss to blockchain.
Case : Bitcoin Gold
A popular case of the 51% attack is that of Bitcoin Gold which occurred on 18 May 2018. In this case, the attacker controlled more than 50% of the hash power of the blockchain. As a result, these malicious actors managed to double-spend the coins for several days. In all, they stole $18 million worth of Bitcoin Gold. \
Ethereum Classic is another example of a crypto project that suffered 51% attacks three times in 2020. As the examples show, 51% attacks are the most significant disadvantage of the proof-of-work consensus mechanism.
Read more : What is a 51% Attack ?
Double Spending
Double-spending means using the same fund for two or more transactions. The advent of online payment ensures that authorities put measures in place to prevent this problem from occurring. \
The existence of intermediaries in the traditional payment systems between the sender and receiver, such as banks and credit card companies, makes it easy to validate transactions. These third parties are trusted to ensure the sender has enough balance to carry out a transaction, and he/she is not sending two or more transactions that only count as one against his balance.
The absence of an intermediary in cryptocurrency requires that a measure is put in place to prevent such risk that can compromise the system. Bitcoin is the first successful digital currency to come up with this measure through its proof-of-work mechanism.
Read more : What Is Double Spending ?
Sybil Attack
A Sybil Attack is when one computer system creates and uses many fake identities to harm a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to get more power and do illegal things against the network rules. The fake identities pretend to be real users but they are controlled by one entity or person. The idea of this attack comes from a book called 《 Sybil 》, where a woman named Sybil Dorsett had multiple personalities. Brian Zill named this attack and John R. Douceur wrote a paper about it comparing it to Dorsett’s disorder.
A Sybil attack on blockchain is when someone manipulates or controls a P2P network by creating and using multiple accounts or nodes. A successful Sybil attack can block users from the network by rejecting blocks or doing a 51% attack ( controlling most of the network ). A Sybil attack is a serious threat to blockchain as it can damage the network’s reputation and cause problems like double-spending.
Read more : What Is a Sybil Attack ?
Dusting Attack
A dusting attack is a way for third parties to identify the person behind a crypto wallet by sending small amounts of cryptocurrency to multiple wallets. This compromises the wallet’s security and privacy. If the user does not notice and convert the tiny deposit, it may lead to phishing or identity disclosure.
The deposit may come as an airdrop that tempts the user to cash out, giving the attacker access to the wallet through the contract address. Many crypto traders or investors ignore the small coins left or transferred in their wallets, which allows dusting attacks to happen.
Read more : What Is a Dusting Attack ?
Replay Attack
A replay attack is when a hacker intercepts and reuses valid data to bypass encryption in a blockchain. This creates a vulnerability in the network. This attack can harm blockchains by accessing information, withdrawing money, duplicating transactions and stealing data with valid credentials. \
However, the damage of replay attacks is limited. The hacker cannot change the data or compromise the chain. The network will reject invalid entries. Replay attacks can be prevented by adding timestamps to data or limiting transactions with the same code.
Read more : What Is a Replay Attack?
Throughout this course, we have learned about the different types of security attacks that can occur in blockchain. We have seen examples of 51% attacks, double spending, Sybil attacks, dusting attacks, and replay attacks, which all pose risks to the security of blockchain systems.
Although these security attacks barely happen, it is crucial to recognize that they pose potential risks when accessing new blockchain networks. As the blockchain industry continues to advance and expand, it is necessary to stay informed about these vulnerabilities to maintain secure and trustworthy transactions.
To mitigate these risks, it is recommended to use reputable and established blockchain networks, avoid sharing private keys or passwords, and stay up-to-date on the latest security protocols and best practices.
By taking these precautions, we can minimize the likelihood of security breaches and ensure the continued success of blockchain technology.
Plain Text
Do not upload this part below !!!
---
Please attach some related articles. - link
Ref :
What Is Cryptography?
What Is Public Key Cryptography (PKC) ?
What Makes a Blockchain Secure ?
What Is a Replay Attack ?
What is End-to-End Encryption (E2EE) ?
General Security Principles in Blockchain
What Are Hardware and Software Wallets?
How to Protect Yourself From Seed Phrase Scams
What Is The Byzantine Generals Problem
What is a Vampire Attack?