Ripple CTO Clarifies Loss of 32,000 Early XRP Ledger Blocks

Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, has reiterated the reasons behind the absence of the first 32,000 ledgers on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), addressing long-standing questions about the integrity and completeness of the network’s early history.

The Origin of the Ledger Gap

The gap in XRPL’s early ledger history has been known for years but continues to attract attention from skeptics. The earliest publicly available ledger starts at number 32,570, leaving the prior records unaccounted for. In an explanation shared in May and reaffirmed in this recent exchange, Schwartz outlined the technical reasons for the data loss.

During the early development phase of the XRP Ledger, several independent ledger streams were generated as the software was being tested and refined. Among these streams, one suffered from a software bug that led to the loss of ledger data from the first ten days.

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^="wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5"]{width:320px;height:100px;} } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^="wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5"]{width:728px;height:90px;} }

The issue was known internally, and while the development team considered initiating a reset of the ledger to produce a clean historical record, that decision was ultimately not pursued.

Why the Ledger Was Not Reset

Schwartz addressed the idea of resetting the ledger head-on. He noted that such a step had been discussed by the development team but was deemed counterproductive. The reasoning, as he explained, was that resetting the ledger would have resulted in the deletion of all historical data past the initial 32,000 blocks, which were already lost. The reset would not have restored any of the missing data and would have instead reduced the transparency of the ledger’s current available history.

In Schwartz’s words, the proposal to reset the ledger “would have removed everything after the 32,000 ledgers,” effectively eliminating the only preserved history on record. This position reflects a technical judgment that preserving as much of the ledger’s real activity as possible was the better course.

A Known Limitation from XRPL’s Early Days

The missing ledger records remain an acknowledged limitation dating back to the network’s experimental stage. According to Schwartz, this was an artifact of testing environments and early implementation challenges, not an intentional deletion or cover-up.

The fact that multiple ledger streams existed during development made it more difficult to ensure long-term data continuity, especially in the absence of finalized production standards at the time.

While the issue has prompted continued criticism from some corners of the crypto community, Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer has consistently maintained that the ledger loss was unavoidable given the circumstances. His responses also underscore that no viable technical remedy exists for recovering the missing data, and that attempts to reset the ledger would only have resulted in further history being lost.

In his most recent comments, Schwartz dismissed the notion that inaction was due to negligence or secrecy. Instead, his explanation frames the decision as a practical compromise made in the interest of preserving as much historical data as possible after an early and unrecoverable technical fault.

Disclaimer*: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.*